When you have been publishing for over 150 years like The Nation has, you could say you’ve seen it all. This magazine has seen robber barons, segregationists, and now Donald Trump. They have also seen various resistance movements rise up; labor, women, homosexuals and immigrants.
The March 27 issue featured a “Field Guide” to the new resistance. To no surprise, there was one segment of the movement missing. There was no mention of groups like One People’s Project or It’s Going Down. The groups that are fighting the Trump agenda, especially its attacks on refugees, immigrants and people of color.
To me, it’s been a common theme of the long-time voice of the American Left. Since the election the magazine has called for resistance, but been reluctant to support much of the organizations taking direct action. An annual list of groups to support did not even include the National Lawyers Guild.
But why is there is reluctance? Part of it may be with the nature of traditional media in this digital age, much of the readership of The Nation may simply be too old to take to the streets. At 42, I may be at the younger end of the magazine’s readership, but I also realize that I am too old to “take to the streets” with the black block. But the readers could at least contribute money to aid efforts.
Another theory has to do with an idea that I noticed during the anti-war movement of the early 2000s. There seems to be almost an East Coast and West Coast divide in terms of activist tactics. The Nation, being based out of New York City, may be more along the Eastern lines of focusing on political action. The activists in the streets are more along the Western model, with an emphasis on direct action.
Am I going to drop my subscription to The Nation? No, but I may look to augment it with publications like Jacobian or In These Times, to go with my subscription to 2600.